
| Natural Speed (2' 54") | Get the Flash Player to see this player.
|
テキストを保存する (右クリック→対象を保存) |
テキストを印刷する (印刷ダイアログが出ます) |
| Slow Speed (3' 09") |
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
|
|
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) by balloon dilatation, brachytherapy, or drug-eluting stents is hampered by a high incidence of recurrent stenosis. Moreover, treating ISR with a drug-eluting stent is a complex procedure that adds another layer of metal to the artery and can create mechanical problems. The SeQuent™ Please drug-eluting balloon may offer a simpler alternative. The balloon has a unique matrix coating that contains paclitaxel and delivers a dose of drug three times greater than a Taxus stent. The balloon is inflated for about 30 seconds inside the narrowed artery. The paclitaxel, which has a natural attraction to cells, quickly moves from the surface of the balloon into the arterial cells. Not only does the drug-eluting balloon avoid a second layer of metal inside the artery, there are no polymers that might cause adverse reactions at the target site. Instead, the carrier used to bind paclitaxel to the balloon is iopromide, a commonly used contrast agent. At ACC.08, investigators presented the results of the Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease II-In-Stent Restenosis study or PEPCAD II-ISR. They randomized 131 patients with ISR in a bare-metal stent to treatment with the drug-eluting balloon or the Taxus drug-eluting stent. Five patients were excluded for protocol violations and four patients in the stent group ended up being treated with the drug-eluting balloon. On an intention-to-treat basis, there was little difference between the two groups. However, an “as-treated” analysis of the 126 patients treated within protocol showed that use of the drug-eluting balloon led to a significant reduction in 6-month late lumen loss (p = 0.03) and in segment binary restenosis (p = 0.007) compared to stent placement. Balloon delivery of the paclitaxel was also associated with a significant reduction in 6 and 12 month major adverse cardiac events (or MACE) compared to a Taxus stent. This difference in MACE was due to a reduction in the need for reintervention. Importantly, unlike stent placement, combined antiplatelet therapy was continued only for 1 month in the balloon arm, followed by treatment with aspirin alone and there was no evidence of late thrombosis. Thus, the paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter is safe and perhaps even more effective than drug-eluting stenting, with the added advantage of only short-term use of antiplatelet therapy. Also, since nothing is left behind in the artery, balloon delivery doesn’t preclude later stent placement or more than one balloon treatment if necessary. |
coronary 冠動脈の |
